MMR: Lenders may choose direct over brokers
Lenders and borrowers will be incentivised to use direct-only channels and abandon intermediaries, the Financial Services Authority has predicted in the latest Mortgage Market Review consultation paper CP11/31.
It said that by giving lenders the responsibility to verify income and assess affordability, lenders might be expected to become more involved in the application process.
This could lead them to prefer direct sales over introduced sales, the FSA said.
The FSA also cited that in recent years there already appeared to be a trend towards the use of direct sales forces irrespective of the proposed rules.
However consultancy firm Oxera suggested that this trend may have been strengthened as a result of the proposed rules.
It said: “Lenders are likely to reduce the number of intermediaries they work with and rely more on their direct sales forces.
“This might disadvantage smaller lenders although they would still be in a position to use intermediaries to screen initial applications on their behalf if they find this beneficial as long as they retain ultimate responsibility to verify income and assess affordability.
“Each intermediary is still likely to have access to a sufficient number of mortgage lenders.
“Borrowers may face higher search costs to access intermediaries if the number of intermediaries is reduced.”
The FSA added that the reduction in the number of relationships between lenders and intermediaries would not significantly affect the degree of competition between lenders.
The analysis suggested that the proposals could, in principle, increase the role of intermediaries in the value chain.
It said: “Intermediaries would be able to help their customers in identifying lenders that would be willing to lend to them and help them prepare the relevant evidence required for income verification.
“However this is unlikely to be substantially different to what intermediaries are doing in the subdued market conditions we are experiencing at the moment where lenders are less willing to lend to some categories of borrowers.”
The FSA added that the requirement for some sellers to disclose cases in which they did not consider direct-only products for consumers may incentivise some consumers to move from intermediaries to direct-only sales.
It said: “This might have competition impacts through increased shopping around by consumers and increased price competition.”
- MMR consultation paper published
- MMR: BSA welcomes FSA proposals
- MMR: CML supports FSA proposal
- MMR: Interest-only stays
- MMR: Imminent implementation if agreeable
- MMR: Consultation dates announced
- MMR: Core underwriting principles announced
- MMR: Mortgages to fund business may be exempt
- MMR: AMI praises FSA proposals
- MMR: Lenders can lend into retirement
- MMR: FSA to scrap IDD
- MMR: Double KFI trigger dropped
- MMR: Self-cert and fast-track banned
- MMR: Proposals to improve fraud detection
- MMR: Equity release to be single market
- MMR: All equity release sales to be advised
- MMR: Proposals will cost industry up to £170m pa
- MMR: Summary of the proposals
- MMR: This is it, not much left to change
- MMR: Borrower responsibility matters
- MMR: No date for individual registration
- MMR: New rules on bridging advice
- MMR: Affordability rules for bridging
- MMR: Bridging not arrears management strategy
- MMR: Bridging put under the microscope
- MMR: Non-bank rules to apply to bridging
- MMR: One in 40 locked out of homeownership
- MMR: IMLA welcomes latest FSA proposals
- MMR: Pink says proposals are a boon to brokers
- FSA fines ASU insurer for TCF fail
- Market to see gradual recovery in 2012
- Now is optimum time to rent
- Tower Bridging joins the Association of Short Term Lenders
- MMR Analysis: pride before a fall
- MMR: Mixed response from industry
Martin Tapper wrote:
The logic of this argument is completely flawed. With the exception of fast-track business I am obliged to support the majority of applications with robust proof of income information. This requirement is simply to be enshrined in the new rules, so what changes are being implemented that lead to the removal of intermediaries to meet this "new" requirement? Surely there could not be a hidden agenda to drive business to the direct (less informed) route!
23 December 2011 18:54:19 GMT
Have Your Say





