Friday 10 February 2012 | RSS Feed

FSA prioritises ‘confrontational’ supervision

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has published its Business Plan setting out its priorities for 2010/11 which focuses on increased ‘confrontational’ supervision.



17 March, 2010

The Plan is a demanding programme of work for the year requiring greater policy and supervisory resources, and focusing on a number of key areas:

  • Delivering effective supervision backed by credible deterrence in enforcement.
  • Continuing to embed the organisational and cultural change needed to implement intensive supervision.
  • The policy reform programme driven by the Turner Review and the wider policy agenda mandated by the European Union.
  • Playing a role in promoting financial stability should the Financial Services Bill be enacted.
The FSA will be recruiting an additional 460 staff in 2010 to implement Solvency 2, and to deliver the intensive supervisory approach needed for the very largest firms.

Commenting, Hector Sants, FSA chief executive said: "Intensive supervision is inherently more confrontational. Our supervisors are making judgements both about the robustness of the business models of firms and the suitability of the products they are selling. We will then intervene promptly if we anticipate problems.

"This proactive approach to supervision requires significantly more people than the old reactive model and those individuals must be of a higher quality and supported by more sophisticated systems. If society wants a more proactive approach it must accept that it will have a larger and more expensive regulator."

In developing intensive supervision the FSA's regulatory approach has moved from retrospective intervention to proactive challenge. Supervisors now make judgements on firms' business models; intervening early if they anticipate any risks that may arise from the firms' conduct, selling practices, senior management competence or product development.”




Your Comments
6 Comment(s)

Pissed off ISA wrote:

When will we get a break? Why not bring back capital punishment and hang all IFAs? Who is going to pay for all this enforcement? Do the public really want it?

17 March 2010 13:17:11 GMT

Recommend? (6)

Pissed Off IFA wrote:

Jobs for the boys and girls that is all this. Hector Sants would be incapable of doing the job of an IFA. Most clients would sling him out the door. The only consolidation is that his tax bill will be increasing next month unless he has managed to register himself as an overseas resident. I do'nt believe that society wants all this. They want the banks to "get a doing!"

17 March 2010 13:22:05 GMT

Recommend? (3)

Steve Rodley wrote:

Why don't they just do our jobs for us? There will be as many staff there soon as there are advisers!!!!! Let's hope the Conservatives win and get rid of this bunch of Morons....

17 March 2010 13:38:47 GMT

Recommend? (8)

Rob Hamshare wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_state

17 March 2010 13:47:21 GMT

Recommend? (1)

Fed up wrote:

Why don't the FSA just come out and say they don't want IFA's

17 March 2010 15:38:05 GMT

Recommend? (0)

Pissed Off IFA wrote:

Glad to see that most of the other contributors agree with me. Suggest that all contributors read their email tonight FSA round up and that their new approaching to hanging IFAs.

17 March 2010 18:13:55 GMT

Recommend? (0)

Have Your Say

Loading