Claims company urges caution on new PPI products
Consumers should be wary of new versions of Payment Protection Insurance which could be sold unfairly like their predecessor, says the Mitchell Farrarr Group.
The group said a record number of claims for mis-sold PPI continued to be received claiming that institutions had not learnt their lesson.
Jim Rowley, managing director at Mitchell Farrar, said: “It was the big high street banks in the UK were the main sellers of PPI policies, to people who took out mortgages, credit cards or other loans. They simply can’t be allowed to ride roughshod over consumers once again.
"We always expected that banks would start to devise new products like short-term income protection or even debt waiver elements as part of a wider agreement or even a mortgage.
“The Financial Services Authority and Office of Fair Trading are stepping in quickly to stamp out harmful new versions of PPI policies which is right and I hope consumers aren’t duped once again.
“I would urge anyone signing an agreement with a bank to study the small print in fine detail and ask all the questions they need to before signing on the dotted line.”
- Property regains favour with investors
- A society of higher debts, fewer assets
- Many businesses still at a standstill
- Lloyds chief steps back on health grounds
- Son of mob boss arrested for FirstPlus mortgage fraud
- Construction activity at five month high
- Precise introduces soft footprint scoring
- Barclays extends BTL range to 75pc LTV
- Accord launches hybrid tracker-to-fix range
- Mortgage Brain launches broker website solution
- Bright Grey and Scot Prov see 21pc increase in new business
Disgruntled wrote:
I laughed - oh how I laughed. A clains company purporting to be guardians of the moral high ground. It's too much too take. We all know that we are, as an industry, responsible for claims firms because of our repeated failures. However to apportion any time or space to these type of people is too much. Enough please
03 November 2011 09:10:48 GMT
Kevin wrote:
sINCE WHEN HAVE cmc'S HAD THE CONSUMERS INTERESTS AT HEART? tHIS COMPANY, JUST LIKE ALL OF THE OTHER CMC'S ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN RIPPING OFF CLIENTS AND TAKING SOME OF THEIR AWARD. CLIENTS CAN CLAIM BACK THEMSELVES WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY THE BARGAIN PRICE OF 25%+VAT....
03 November 2011 11:39:42 GMT
Have Your Say





