FSA announces soft commissions policy update
This is aimed to assist the industry to continue its progress towards a market-based solution to the transparency and accountability issues raised by soft and bundled brokerage commissions. That progress has been encouraging so far.
The FSA set out its findings on soft and bundled brokerage commissions in a policy statement earlier this year. This concluded that fund managers’ use of commission should be limited to the purchase of ‘execution’ and ‘research’, and the FSA committed to clarifying the scope of these terms.
Hector Sants, Managing Director of the FSA’s Wholesale Business Unit, said: “We set the industry a challenging timetable and the three industry bodies – IMA, LIBA, and NAPF – have engaged well to develop a solution that meets the need. They now need the FSA to deliver on its commitment to clarify execution and research so they can meet the year end deadline.
“In this document we have set out for brokers, fund managers and customers what services may not be paid for from commission and the key characteristics of execution and research. I am confident that this work will aid the industry in the development of a disclosure-based solution, working with the grain of the market and bringing greater transparency.”
The FSA view is that all services currently regarded as being outside the soft commission regime, as well as some of those within it, should not be paid for from commission. This is because they are not sufficiently connected with particular investment management decisions or transactions. Examples include:
* services related to the valuation or performance measurement of portfolios;
* dedicated telephone lines;
* subscriptions for publications;
* most custody services; and
* travel, accommodation or entertainment costs.
The FSA has formed the view that ‘execution’ includes all services provided by a broker which meet the following criteria:
– they are demonstrably linked to the arranging and conclusion of a specific transaction; and
– arise between the point at which the fund manager makes an investment decision and the point at which the transaction is concluded.
These execution services would include booking and processing of orders, related costs arising directly from trading and activities which would constitute active order management, i.e. advice on order handling, programme trades etc.
Following discussion with the industry the FSA concludes that ‘research’ embodies the concept of rigorous, ‘value-added’ analysis, with clear intellectual content that assists fund managers to make investment decisions in relation to their clients’ portfolios. Research will include original written research, discussions between fund managers and research providers and possibly ‘artificial intelligence’. This will not include raw data feeds.
Industry Progress on Disclosure
The industry has taken up the challenge to develop improved disclosure on the costs to clients of ‘execution’ and ‘research’. The Investment Management Association (IMA) has been working closely with the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) and the London Investment Banking Association (LIBA). The FSA is encouraged by the progress made to date. Although subject to broader consultation with fund managers and their clients following pilot studies, the IMA/NAPF proposals look to have the potential to deliver the improvements in transparency and accountability that the FSA seeks, and which would drive greater efficiency in fund managers’ decisions on ‘execution’ and ‘research’. FSA is also confident that IMA and LIBA will develop robust mechanisms which differentiate execution within overall commission in a way that will support a disclosure regime of real substance.